Showing posts with label Report. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Report. Show all posts

Saturday, January 18, 2014

The Sportsmanship of Cyber-warfare ...item 2.. Gauss, a new "cyber-espionage toolkit" (August 9, 2012 11:08 AM PDT) ...item 3.. New U.S. intelligence report raises urgency over Iran"s nuclear program (Aug.09, 2012)

A few nice Israel iran conflict images I found:


The Sportsmanship of Cyber-warfare …item 2.. Gauss, a new “cyber-espionage toolkit” (August 9, 2012 11:08 AM PDT) …item 3.. New U.S. intelligence report raises urgency over Iran’s nuclear program (Aug.09, 2012)
Israel iran conflict

Image by marsmet545

So far, Gauss has swiped data from the Bank of Beirut, EBLF, BlomBank, ByblosBank, FransaBank and Credit Libanais. Citibank and PayPal users are also targeted.


Why Gauss? The malware’s main module was named after German mathematician Johann Carl Friedrich Gauss. Other components are also named after well-known mathematicians.

.


……..*****All images are copyrighted by their respective authors ……..

.


When it comes to protecting a nation, cries of “that’s unfair” or “un-sporting” should be relegated to the “whatever” bucket.


Any nation’s military, counter-intelligence organization, or other agency tasked with protecting its citizens would be catastrophically failing in their obligations if they’re not already actively pursuing new tools and tactics for the cyber-realm.


Granted, just like the military use of aircraft in WW1 opened a Pandora’s box of armed conflict that changed the world forever, ever since the first byte’s traversed the first network we’ve been building towards the state we’re in.


– Gunter Ollmann, VP Research

.

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

.

…..item 1)…. DAMBALLA … blog.damballa.com … THE DAY BEFORE ZERO …


An Ongoing Conversation About Advanced Threats …


Posts Tagged ‘cyberwar’


The Sportsmanship of Cyber-warfare

Wednesday, June 27th, 2012


blog.damballa.com/?tag=cyberwar


As a bit of a history buff I can’t avoid a slight tingling of déjà vu every time I read some new story commenting upon the ethics, morality and legality of cyber-warfare/cyber-espionage/cyberwar/cyber-attack/cyber-whatever. All this rhetoric about Stuxnet, Flame, and other nation-state cyber-attack tools, combined with the parade of newly acknowledged cyber-warfare capabilities and units within the armed services of countries around the globe, brings to the fore so many parallels

.

………………………….


img code photo … The Sportsmanship of Cyber-warfare


blog.damballa.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/062712_1930_…


………………………….

.


with the discussions about the (then) new-fangled use of flying-machines within the military in the run-up to WWI.


Call me a cynic if you will, but when the parallels in history are so evident, we’d be crazy to ignore them.


The media light that has been cast upon the (successful) deployment of cyber-weapons recently has many people in a tail-spin – reflecting incredulity and disbelief that such weapons exist, let alone have already been employed by military forces. Now, as people begin to understand that such tools and tactics have been fielded by nation-states for many years prior to these most recent public exposures, reactions run from calls for regulation through to global moratoriums on their use. Roll the clock back 100 years and you’ll have encountered pretty much the same reaction to the unsporting use of flying-machines as weapons of war.


That said, military minds have always sought new technologies to gain the upper-hand on and off the battlefield. Take for example Captain Bertram Dickenson’s statement to the 1911 Technical Sub-Committee for Imperial Defence (TSID) who were charged with considering the role of aeroplanes in future military operations:


“In case of a European war, between two countries, both sides would be equipped with large corps of aeroplanes, each trying to obtain information on the other… the efforts which each would exert in order to hinder or prevent the enemy from obtaining information… would lead to the inevitable result of a war in the air, for the supremacy of the air, by armed aeroplanes against each other. This fight for the supremacy of the air in future wars will be of the greatest importance…”


A century later, substitute “cyber-warriors” for aeroplanes and “Internet” for air, and you’d be hard-pressed to tell the difference from what you’re seeing in the news today.


Just as the prospect of a bomb falling from the hands of an aviator hanging out the cockpit of a zeppelin or biplane fundamentally changed the design of walled fortifications and led to the development of anti-aircraft weaponry, new approaches to securing the cyber-frontier are needed and underway. Then, as now, it wasn’t until civilians were alerted to (or encountered first-hand) the reality of the new machines of war, did an appreciation of these fundamental changes become apparent.


But there are a number of other parallels to WWI (and the birth of aerial warfare) and where cyber-warfare is today that I think are interesting too.


Take for example how the aviators of the day thought of themselves as being different and completely apart from the other war-fighters around them. The camaraderie of the pilots who, after spending their day trying to shoot-down their counterparts, were only too happy to have breakfast, and exchange stories over a few stiff drinks with the downed pilots of the other side is legendary. I’m not sure if it was mutual respect, or a sharing of a common heritage that others around them couldn’t understand, but the net result was that that first-breed of military aviator found more in common with their counterparts than with their own side.

.

…………………………..


img code photo … WW1 Aviators


blog.damballa.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/062712_1930_…


…………………………..

.


Today, I think you’ll likely encounter the equivalent social scene as introverted computer geeks who, by way of day-job, develop the tools that target and infiltrate foreign installations for their country, yet attend the same security conferences and reveal their latest evasion tactic or privilege escalation technique over a cold beer with one-another. Whether it’s because the skill-sets are so specialized, or that the path each cyber-warrior had to take in order to acquire those skills was so influential upon their world outlook, many of the people I’ve encountered that I would identify as being capable of truly conducting warfare within the cyber-realm share more in common with their counterparts than they do with those tasking them.


When it comes to protecting a nation, cries of “that’s unfair” or “un-sporting” should be relegated to the “whatever” bucket. Any nation’s military, counter-intelligence organization, or other agency tasked with protecting its citizens would be catastrophically failing in their obligations if they’re not already actively pursuing new tools and tactics for the cyber-realm. Granted, just like the military use of aircraft in WW1 opened a Pandora’s box of armed conflict that changed the world forever, ever since the first byte’s traversed the first network we’ve been building towards the state we’re in.


The fact that a small handful of clandestine, weaponized cyber-arms have materialized within the public realm doesn’t necessarily represent a newly opened Pandora’s box – instead it reflects merely one of the evils from a box that was opened at the time the Internet was born.


– Gunter Ollmann, VP Research


Tags: cyberwar, Flame, stuxnet

Posted in Industry Commentary, Threat Research | No Comments »


.

.

.


Chinese Hackers and Cyber Realpolitik

Friday, December 16th, 2011


For many people the comments made by Michael Hayden, Former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, at this week’s Black Hat Technical Security Conference in Abu Dhabi may have been unsettling as he commented upon the state of Chinese cyber espionage.


I appreciate the candor of his observations and the distinction he made between state-level motivations. In particular, his comment “We steal secrets, you bet. But we steal secrets that are essential for American security and safety. We don’t steal secrets for American commerce, for American profit. There are many other countries in the world that do not so self limit.”


Perhaps I grew up reading too many spy stories or watched one-too-many James Bond movies, but I’ve always considered one of the functions of government is to run clandestine operations and uncover threats to their citizens and their economic wellbeing. The fact that Cyber is a significant and fruitful espionage vector shouldn’t really be surprising. Granted, it’s not as visual as digging a 1476 foot long tunnel under Soviet Berlin during the Cold War (see The Berlin Tunnel Operation GOLD (U.S.) Operation STOPWATCH (U.K.)) or as explosive as the French infiltration and eventual destruction of the Greenpeace Rainbow Warrior in New Zealand, but in today’s electronic society cyber espionage is a necessary tool.


Personally, I think you’d struggle to find a country or government anywhere around the world that hasn’t invested resources in building out their cyber espionage capabilities in recent years. It’s a tool of modern statecraft and policing.


While the media tends to focus upon the term “cyber warfare” and its many faceted security and safety ramifications, I think that we often fail to divorce a governments need (or even expectation) to conduct espionage and what would logically be covered by the articles (and declaration) of war. Granted it all gets a bit fuzzy – just look at the history of the “Cold War”. Perhaps a more appropriate name for the current situation and tensions would be “Cyber Realpolitik“.


China is often depicted as the bogeyman – rightly or wrongly – when it comes to cyber espionage. We increasingly find ourselves drawn into a debate of whether attacks which are instigated or traced back to the country are state-sponsored, state-endorsed, socially acceptable, or merely the patriotic duty of appropriately skilled citizens. The fact of the matter though is that there’s a disproportionate volume of cyber-attacks and infiltration attempts coming from China, targeting North American and European commercial institutions. You may argue that this is an artifact of China’s population but, if that was the case, wouldn’t India feature more highly then? India is more populous and arguably has a better developed education system in the field of information technology and software development – and yet they are rarely seen on the totem pole of threat instigators.


Michael Hayden alludes that China (and other countries) is not opposed to using cyber espionage for commercial advancement and profit, and based upon past observations, I would tend to agree with that conclusion. That said though, I don’t think that any country is immune to the temptation. Given the hoopla of the recent U.S. congressional insider trading fiasco and French presidential corruption, I’m not sure that “self limit” approaches work in all cases.


Cyber Realpolitik is the world we find ourselves living in and cyber espionage is arguably the latest tool in a government’s clandestine toolkit. We could consume a lot of time debating the ethics and outcomes of modern espionage campaigns but, at the end of the day, it’s a facet of international politics and governmental needs that have existed for millennium. For those commercial entities being subjected to the cyber campaigns directed at them by foreign governments, I don’t believe this threat will be going away anytime in the foreseeable future. Perhaps the noise surrounding the attacks may disappear, but that may just reflect an increase in stealthiness.


– Gunter Ollmann, VP Research.


Tags: APT, China, CIA, cyber espionage, cyberwar, malware

Posted in Industry Commentary, Threat Research | No Comments »

.

.

.

.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

.

…..item 2)…. CNET News … news.cnet.com … CNET News Security & Privacy


With Gauss tool, cyberspying moves beyond Stuxnet, Flame


Kaspersky Lab finds Gauss, a spying malware that collects financial information and resembles Flame. Components are named after famous mathematicians.


by Larry Dignan … August 9, 2012 11:08 AM PDT


news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57490216-83/with-gauss-tool-cyb…


Gauss, a new "cyber-espionage toolkit," has emerged in the Middle East and is capable of stealing sensitive data such as browser passwords, online banking accounts, cookies, and system configurations, according to Kaspersky Lab. Gauss appears to have come from the same nation-state factories that produced Stuxnet.


According to Kaspersky, Gauss has unique characteristics relative to other malware. Kaspersky said it found Gauss following the discovery of Flame. The International Telecommunications Union has started an effort to identify emerging cyberthreats and mitigate them before they spread.


In a nutshell, Gauss launched around September 2011 and was discovered in June. Gauss, which resembles Flame, had its command and control infrastructure shut down in July, but the malware is dormant waiting for servers to become active. Kaspersky noted in an FAQ:


There is enough evidence that this is closely related to Flame and Stuxnet, which are nation-state sponsored attacks. We have evidence that Gauss was created by the same "factory" (or factories) that produced Stuxnet, Duqu and Flame.

.

………………………………


img code photo … The Relationship of Stuxnet, Duqu, Flame and Gauss


cdn-static.zdnet.com/i/story/70/00/002405/kaspersky5.png


………………………………

.


Among Gauss’ key features:


…Gauss collects data on machines and sends it to attackers. This data includes network interface information, computer drive details and BIOS characteristics.


…The malware can infect USB thumb drives using the vulnerabilities found in Stuxnet and Flame.


…Gauss can disinfect drives under certain circumstances and then uses removable media to store collected data in a hidden file.


…The malware also installs a special font called Palida Narrow.


Since May 2012, Gauss has infected more than 2,500 machines, mostly in the U.S. Kaspersky said that the total number of Gauss victims is likely to be in the "tens of thousands." That number is lower than Stuxnet, but higher than Flame and Duqu attacks.

.

……………………….


img code photo … Incidents


cdn-static.zdnet.com/i/story/70/00/002405/kaspersky2.png


……………………….

.


So far, Gauss has swiped data from the Bank of Beirut, EBLF, BlomBank, ByblosBank, FransaBank and Credit Libanais. Citibank and PayPal users are also targeted.


Why Gauss? The malware’s main module was named after German mathematician Johann Carl Friedrich Gauss. Other components are also named after well-known mathematicians.


A few key slides from Kaspersky’s Gauss report:

.

……………………………


img code photo … Unique users


cdn-static.zdnet.com/i/story/70/00/002405/kaspersky1.png


……………………………

.


This story was first published as "Meet Gauss: The latest cyber-espionage tool" on ZDNet’s Between the Lines.


Topics:Cybercrime, Security, Vulnerabilities and attacks Tags:cyber-espionage, Kaspersky Lab, Gauss, malware

.

.

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

.

…..item 3)…. HAARETZ … www.haaretz.com/news … HomeNewsDiplomacy & Defense


Barak: New U.S. intelligence report raises urgency over Iran’s nuclear program


Defense Minister Ehud Barak confirms Haaretz’s report that Obama recently received an NIE report which shares Israel’s view on Iran’s progress toward nuclear capability; Israel, U.S. positions on Iran now closer, says Barak.

.

………………………


img code photo … Iron Dome battery site in Ashkelon


www.haaretz.com/polopoly_fs/1.455275.1344511493!/image/33…


U.S. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and Defense Minister Ehud Barak hold a joint news conference at an Iron Dome battery site in Ashkelon August 1, 2012.


Photo by Reuters


………………………

.


By Barak Ravid | Aug.09, 2012 | 1:03 PM |


www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/barak-new-u-s-inte…


Defense Minister Ehud Barak confirmed on Thursday Haaretz’s report that President Barack Obama recently received a new National Intelligence Estimate report on the Iranian nuclear program, which shares Israel’s view that Iran has made significant progress toward military nuclear capability, and said that the report has raised the urgency of the issue.


Speaking on Israel Radio on Thursday morning, Barak said that there is a U.S. intelligence report "being passed around senior offices," and that, as far as Israel knows, this report has brought the U.S. position over Iran closer to the Israeli position, and made the issue more urgent.


For months there has been a basic agreement (between the U.S. and Israel) over what the Iranians are planning to do, and a deep understanding of what is stopping them, the defense minister said in the interview.


Barak also said that Israel will have to make a decision over Iran’s nuclear program. "All the options are still on the table, and when we say this, we mean it," he said.


"There is still no decision, we understand the gravity of the situation, we understand that we do not have all the time in the world to decide. We are facing tough decisions…we will listen to all assessments and comments, and when we have to make decisions, we will make them, and the decision will of course come from the government," he said.


Haaretz reported on Thursday that the National Intelligence Estimate report on Iran was supposed to have been submitted to Obama a few weeks ago, but it was revised to include new and alarming intelligence information about military components of Iran’s nuclear program. Haaretz has learned that the report’s conclusions are quite similar to those drawn by Israel’s intelligence community.


The NIE report contends that Iran has made surprising, notable progress in the research and development of key components of its military nuclear program.


The NIE reports are the most important assessments compiled by the U.S. intelligence community and are submitted to the president and other top governmental officials. This NIE report was compiled by an inter-departmental team headed by director of National Intelligence James Clapper. Its contents articulate the views of American intelligence agencies.

.

.

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

.

.


Ralph Nader on Barack Obama
Israel iran conflict

Image by publik18

Ralph Nader on Barack Obama: “It is Quite Clear He is a Corporate Candidate from A to Z” Independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader discusses his independent run for the White House, the media blackout of third party candidates, and his stance on the Iraq war, the military-industrial complex, the global food crisis, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and more.


nswcnn.blogspot.com/2008/06/ralph-nader-on-barack-obama.html



The Sportsmanship of Cyber-warfare ...item 2.. Gauss, a new "cyber-espionage toolkit" (August 9, 2012 11:08 AM PDT) ...item 3.. New U.S. intelligence report raises urgency over Iran"s nuclear program (Aug.09, 2012)

Monday, December 9, 2013

Russia strikes missile deal with Egypt: report

Egypt-Russia Large Dam memorial
egypt russia
Impression by tom@hk | 湯米tomhk


Russia strikes missile offer with Egypt: report

MOSCOW // The head of Russia&#39s condition-managed industrial keeping organization says Moscow has signed a offer to give Egypt with air-defence missile programs. The assertion by Russian Technologies main Sergei Chemezov yesterday adopted final week&#39s&nbsp…
Read through far more on The Nationwide


Egypt Turning to Russia? Don&#39t Rely On It

He also mentioned just before Kerry arrived that that Egypt would seem “beyond the United States” to meet up with its protection demands.” Egypt would build “multiple options, numerous options” which includes armed forces relationships. The obvious implication is that Egypt will …
Read much more on Algemeiner




Russia strikes missile deal with Egypt: report

Sunday, December 1, 2013

Report: Rouhani says Iran will not dismantle nuclear facilities

Bad Signs from Iran (wide)
Iran nuclear focus_keyword
Image by Truthout.org

(Photo Illustration: Jared Rodriguez / t r u t h o u t, Adapted From: erjkprunczyk / flickr and hill.josh / flickr)


Image paired with the story:

Gareth Porter | Leaked Iran Paper Based on Intel That Split IAEA
www.truthout.org/1006096


Adapted from:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/24842486@N07/ / CC BY-NC-SA 2.0
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jbhill/ / CC BY 2.0


Report: Rouhani says Iran will not dismantle nuclear facilities

Iran will not dismantle any of its nuclear facilities as part of an effort to reach a long-term agreement to limit its nuclear development, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said in an interview published Friday in The Financial Times. Asked during the …
Read more on CNN (blog)


Netanyahu: Iran Nuclear Deal A "Historic Mistake"

JERUSALEM (AP) — Israel"s prime minister harshly condemned the international community"s nuclear deal with Iran on Sunday while Saudi Arabia remained conspicuously quiet, reflecting the jitters felt throughout the Middle East over Iran"s acceptance on …
Read more on Huffington Post




Report: Rouhani says Iran will not dismantle nuclear facilities

Tuesday, November 12, 2013

Israel issues warning on report on Iran bomb

Core4Life – Advanced Memory Formula … Iran, Israel, and the Bomb (July 4, 2012 / 14 Tammuz 5772) .. the current issue (July/August 2012) of Foreign Affairs — Kenneth Waltz …
iran israel war

Image by marsmet545

First, Waltz declares that Iran’s leaders are rational, hence no need for concern about a nuclear bomb in their hands.


Really?


Just because Waltz deems them to be dependable actors who, he asserts, will behave like others moderated by their possession of a nuclear bomb (does that include North Korea’s strongmen?), are we all now to go home and get a good night’s sleep?


.


……..***** All images are copyrighted by their respective authors ……..

.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

.

…..item 1)…. aish.com … www.aish.com/jw … HOME ISRAEL MIDDLE EAST …


Iran, Israel, and the Bomb

.

……………………………..


img code photo … Iran, Israel, and the Bomb


media.aish.com/images/IranIsraelBomb230x150-EN.jpg


……………………………..

.


A prominent scholar who argues for a nuclear Iran could not be more wrong.


by David A. Harris


www.aish.com/jw/me/Iran_Israel_and_the_Bomb.html


When I first saw the headline in the current issue (July/August 2012) of Foreign Affairs – "Why Iran Should Get the Bomb" – I thought there was a typo. Surely it was meant to read "Why Iran Should Get the Bomb – Not!"


But then I remembered that this bimonthly journal is not known for its typos – nor, for that matter, irony.

On the contrary, this is arguably the world’s most influential and straight-shooting publication on foreign policy.


The author of this particular essay, Kenneth Waltz, is no slouch, either. He is a prominent scholar and a founder of the neorealism school in international relations theory.


So I turned to the piece, eager to see if my own longstanding concern about an Iranian bomb was perhaps misplaced.


I was dumbfounded by what I read.


Here are a few choice snippets:


….. "Most U.S., European, and Israeli commentators and policymakers warn that a nuclear-armed Iran would be the worst possible outcome of the current standoff. In fact, it would probably be the best possible result: the one most likely to restore stability to the Middle East."


….. "Another oft-touted worry is that if Iran obtains the bomb, other states in the region will follow suit, leading to a nuclear arms race in the Middle East…. Should Iran become the second Middle Eastern nuclear power since 1945, it would hardly signal the start of a landslide…. No other country in the region will have an incentive to acquire its own nuclear capability, and the current crisis will finally dissipate, leading to a Middle East that is more stable than it is today."


….."Diplomacy between Iran and the major powers should continue…. But the current sanctions on Iran can be dropped: they primarily harm ordinary Iranians, with little purpose."

And then there’s Waltz’s closing line: "When it comes to nuclear weapons, now as ever, more may be better."


In essence, Waltz constructs his argument on two pillars.


First, he asserts the core problem in the Middle East is Israel’s nuclear arsenal, which needs to be balanced by another power, in this case Iran.


And second, he believes such a balance of power inherently stabilizes the situation, thereby reducing, not increasing, the risk of conflict.


He could not be more wrong on Iran.


Iran does not fit the theoretical template, drawn from his research, that he seeks to impose on it, and the consequences of this misreading could be profound.


Waltz declares that Iran’s leaders are rational, hence no need for concern about a nuclear bomb in their hands. Really?


First, Waltz declares that Iran’s leaders are rational, hence no need for concern about a nuclear bomb in their hands.


Really?


Just because Waltz deems them to be dependable actors who, he asserts, will behave like others moderated by their possession of a nuclear bomb (does that include North Korea’s strongmen?), are we all now to go home and get a good night’s sleep?


Is their Shiite eschatology, focused on hastening the coming of the Hidden Imam, not to be taken into account, as if there were no place for state ideology in the discussion?


Apropos, is it just possible that their vision of the "end of days" could be accelerated by a world without Israel? After all, the former Iranian president, Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, famously declared "[T]he use of even one nuclear bomb inside Israel would destroy everything."


Could that kind of thinking not prompt Iranian leaders, living in a self-imposed cocoon, to conclude that the risk might be worth the reward?


Was their recruitment of young Iranian boys as would-be bomb sappers in the eight-year war with Iraq, and armed only with plastic keys to enter "heaven" and the awaiting 72 virgins, the behavior of a "rational" government?


Was the plot to blow up a Washington restaurant and kill the Saudi ambassador to the U.S. the thinking of a predictable regime?


Second, Waltz’s confidence that there would be no "landslide" of proliferation in the Middle East if Iran goes nuclear is belied by the facts.


He totally ignores the regional context. There is no mention of the critically important Shiite-Sunni rivalry. He inexplicably fails to note the panic in neighboring Arab countries, documented in Wikileaks and elsewhere, about the prospect of an Iranian nuclear bomb.


Is it conceivable that Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and, for that matter, Turkey would sit idly by and watch neighboring Iran become a nuclear power without following suit — and with all the attendant consequences?


The prospect of such a neighborhood hegemon sends shivers up the spines of everyone in the region, save Iran’s few friends, such as Bashar al-Assad’s Syria, and those already too "Finlandized" by Iran’s growing assertiveness to speak up.


And, speaking of proliferation, Waltz unconvincingly dismisses the possibility of Iran passing along its nuclear technology to terrorist groups, and entirely ignores the prospect of Tehran sharing nuclear tidbits with state actors, such as Hugo Chavez’s Venezuela.


Third, Israel’s nuclear arsenal, believed to have been developed over 50 years ago, has not created the strategic imbalance that Waltz suggests needs recalibrating.


Indeed, that reported arsenal neither stopped Egypt and Syria from provoking war in 1967, nor launching a surprise attack against Israel in 1973.


Nor did it halt the PLO from waging its terrorism campaign.


Nor did it dissuade Hamas and Islamic Jihad from firing thousands of missiles and rockets at Israel.


Nor did it block Hezbollah from triggering a war with Israel from its redoubt in Lebanon.


Moreover, unlike Iran, Israel has never threatened another nation with extinction.


Thus, to put Israel and Iran in the same boat, as Waltz does, is utterly irresponsible.


And finally, Waltz calls for the continuation of diplomacy with Iran and the end of sanctions. Huh?


Drop the sanctions, as Waltz suggests, and we will have precisely the outcome he invites – a nuclear-armed, chest-thumping Iran, convinced, not without good reason, that it had masterfully manipulated a gullible world. At that point, what useful purpose could diplomacy serve?


As the P5+1 faces the growing prospect of failed talks with Iran, there will doubtless be more calls from the likes of Waltz for some dramatic accommodation with Tehran.


Nothing could be more dangerous for regional and global stability.


And nothing would better prove our inability to learn the lessons of history than, to borrow from the title of Barbara Tuchman’s book, such a march of folly.

.

.

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

.

.


Israel issues warning on report on Iran bomb

A new report that says Iran may need as little as a month to produce enough uranium for a nuclear bomb is further evidence for why Israel will take military action before that happens, an Israeli defense official said Friday. "We have made it crystal …
Read more on USA TODAY

Israel Buys the US Congress: Sabotaging the US-Iran Peace Negotiations

The question of war or peace with Iran rests with the policies adopted by the White House and the US Congress. The peace overtures by newly elected Iranian President Rohani have resonated favorably around the world, except with Israel and its Zionist …
Read more on Voltaire Network



Israel issues warning on report on Iran bomb

Libya, Syria and the Road to World War III - Paul Craig Roberts on The Corbett Report



Dr. Paul Craig Roberts joins The Corbett Report to discuss recent military intervention in Lybia, possible military intervention in Syria, and the long-term …
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Libya, Syria and the Road to World War III - Paul Craig Roberts on The Corbett Report

Saturday, November 9, 2013

CBS Correspondent Apologizes for Report on Benghazi Attack

CBS Correspondent Apologizes for Report on Benghazi Assault

Threshold Editions has released publications by Glenn Beck, Karl Rove, Mary Cheney and Mark R. Levin. Mr. Davies, who worked for Blue Mountain, has disavowed the incident report, saying in an interview final 7 days with the on-line magazine The Day-to-day Beast that&nbsp…
Study more on New York Instances

How Kennedy"s Assassination Transformed The Secret Provider

Pay attention. Nov. 22 will mark the 50th anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas, a second that left an indelible mark on people who don’t forget it. … The president rides in a limousine so armored it"s referred to as &quotthe Beast …
Study much more on WFPL

 


“How does this relate to Acquiring AND Marketing”? Scroll to :06:07 and :fifteen:53 listed here: http://www.youtube.com/observe?v=ADqnak6yUBg Much more Info ON THE ANTICHRI…
Movie Rating: 4 / five

CBS Correspondent Apologizes for Report on Benghazi Attack

EU-backed Greek officers illegally reject, unwell-take care of 2000 migrants, report claims

EU-backed Greek officials illegally reject, sick-deal with 2000 migrants, report suggests

Greece, bowing to stress from the European Union (EU) to suppress the circulation of refugees fleeing to Europe, has enforced a strict immigration coverage in cooperation with the European border agency, Frontex. Greece partly sealed its land border with Turkey …
Read more on Kathimerini

EU states approve "backloading" repair to rescue bloc"s carbon emissions trade

A greater part of European Union customers authorized a proposal to hold off an auction of allowances in the bloc"s Emissions Trading Program (ETS), the EU presidency, at present held by Lithuania, announced Friday. The program, which was rejected only by Poland and&nbsp…
Study a lot more on Deutsche Welle

 



EU-backed Greek officers illegally reject, unwell-take care of 2000 migrants, report claims

Tuesday, November 5, 2013

Report: Iranian Innovative Guards Commander Killed in Syria

Report: Iranian Innovative Guards Commander Killed in Syria

Muhammad G"malizda, a senior commander of Iran"s Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), has been reported to have been killed in the Syrian Civil War, in accordance to the Point out-backed Iranian Mehr news company. G"mazlida was killed sometime more than the last&nbsp…
Study a lot more on Arutz Sheva


Investigation: Obama"s cupboard fears Mideast black hole

But in get to shift attention somewhere else, his administration would conduct a diplomatic full-court docket push on the region"s two best resources of instability: Iran"s nuclear system and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Obama declared that … For …
Read through a lot more on Jerusalem Put up



 


http://usawatchdog.com/controversy-above-irans-nuclear-system-is-a-hoax-paul-craig-roberts/ – Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, Assistant Treasury Secretary in the Rea…
Movie Rating: four / 5

Report: Iranian Innovative Guards Commander Killed in Syria